Recently in Assault Category

July 26, 2011

Holmdel Court Lawyer

Holmdel Criminal Defense

Holmdel police make a substantial amount or arrests, mostly for DWI and drug possession. Often, these charges go hand in hand. Simple traffic tickets in Holmdel can easily escalate into to a DWI arrest or drug charge if a police officer smells marijuana or alcohol on you or from inside your car. If you are facing a DWI or drug arrest in Holmdel, call to speak with a local defense attorney.

The most common criminal charges in Holmdel are for possession of marijuana (NJSA 2C:35-10(a)4) and domestic violence - assault (NJSA 2C:12-1). Domestic violence cases can often be much more complicated than they initially seem. Moreover, even cases that are not even provable are sometimes vigorously pursued by prosecutors in certain cases, especially domestic violence.

In general, if you are arrested for a crime, an outstanding warrant, or DWI, you should remain calm and cooperative with police. "Being cooperative" does not mean make a statement! Before speaking with police, always speak first with an experienced defense attorney. I represent both adults and juveniles accused of crimes in Holmdel.

Holmdel DWI

DWI cases are difficult to defend. This is due to both politics and practical reasons. No judge, prosecutor or politician wants to appear being "soft" on drunk driving. Partly because of this, NJ DWI law seems to become more and more strict and even draconian every year.

On the practical side, most DWI defendants are factually guilty. The very nature of the charge results in credibility and other issues at trial. That said, there are many defenses to a Howell DUI if your attorney knows where to look for them in your case and how to exploit them in court.

Holmdel, New Jersey


Holmdel Township, named for the Holmes family of landowners, was formed in 1857 from portions of Raritan Township, now called Hazlet. It is a suburb of New York City, located roughly 35 miles south of Manhattan and 15 miles west of the Jersey shore. Former and merged names include Baptisttown and Brays Meeting House.

Holmdel has a long and rich history of association with technological and communications corporations, high rankings in income level and quality of schools. Several research facilities are located in this township.

The civilian employment by industry is mostly represented by those in the professional, scientific and technical services at 14.0% vs. for state and national (8.1 and 5.9, respectively).

According to the last census in 2000, the township has a total area of 18.1 square miles comprised mostly of land (97.7%). The population has grown steadily since 1990 from 11,532 to 15,781 in 2000 and 16.773 in 2010. A bare 9.9% of the population is included in the age group of 16 to 24 and the average age of the residents is 38.12.

The most common first ancestries reported in Holmdel Township are Italian 29.0%, Irish 12.6%, German 6.7% and Polish 4.0%. . The racial composition as of 2000 was 80.20% White, 17.45% Asian and less than 1% each from other races or ethnicities. Out of the percentage of residents of Asian origin, 21% were born in Taiwan and 13% in China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan).Hispanic or Latinos represent only 2.5% of the township's residents.

Just the percentage of residents who identify themselves as of Chinese ancestry represent the highest percentage in any other place in New Jersey with 1,000 or more residents. The other most common places of birth for foreign-born residents are India (10%), Korea (6%), Italy (5%), Turkey (4%) and Pakistan (3%).

In 2003 the FBI recorded ten violent crimes with no murders or homicides. The total violent crime rate was 0.6 per 1,000 people.

Estimated median household income in 2008 was $144,057 up from the median of $112,879 in 1999. According to figures from the U.S. Census Bureau, the median income for a household in the township in 2000 was $112,879 vs. $41,994 for the nation. The average family income of $159,000 per annum in 2009 made it one of the highest in the country.

The estimated median value of a house or condo stood at $112,879 in 2008, more than twice the value of 2000 ($397,300). According to the last census, owner-occupied housing units accounted for 92.0% of the total units.

The high quality of this township's education is the responsibility of four public schools and two Catholic institutions that serve students from kindergarten through twelfth grade. Holmdel High School ranked prominently in 2010 among high schools in the state as well as nationally in 2011.

Very high percentages of Holmdel's residents have a Bachelor's degree (26.7% vs. 18.8 for state) and Master's, professional or doctorate degrees (28.1% vs. 11.0%).

Holmdel Court

Address:

Holmdel Municipal Court
4 Crawfords Corner Rd, PO Box 410
Holmdel, NJ 07733

Phone: (732) 946-4713

The Holmdel traffic court has jurisdiction over traffic violations, disorderly persons offenses, and local ordinance violations.

June 29, 2011

Marlboro Criminal Defense Attorney

Marlboro Police make a surprising number of criminal arrests. Most of the criminal arrests in Marlboro are for shoplifting and marijuana possession. I have represented clients for both these charges in the Marlboro Court. A significant amount of the criminal charges in Marlboro are also domestic violence related.

Either a police officer or a private citizen can file a criminal complaint in the Marlboro Township Court. The Marlboro Municipal Court has jurisdiction over most of these charges. If the charge is an indictable crime (felony), it will be sent to the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office for review.

In the meantime, you will be scheduled for a first appearance in the Marlboro Municipal Court. The court is located at 1979 Township Drive, Marlboro, New Jersey. The court is very close to Manalapan Township, which has its own municipal court only minutes away. Marlboro lies at the intersection of several important roads. These include Route 9, Route 18 and Route 520. Arrests for marijuana possession and drug paraphernalia are common after routine traffic stops on these roads.

This is known as the "complaint stage." During this process, the intake unit will screen the complaints and any available evidence to determine whether they are going to keep the case. In some cases, the prosecutor's office decides that there is insufficient evidence or that the allegations are too minor to warrant their involvement. In these cases, the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office will usually downgrade the indictable charges and return the complaints to the Marlboro Municipal Court as disorderly persons offenses.

In other states, disorderly persons offenses are called misdemeanors. In New Jersey, we have a distinction between disorderly persons and petty disorderly persons offenses. Common disorderly persons offenses in Marlboro include shoplifting and simple assault. These charges are punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a $1000 fine. Common petty disorderly persons offenses include disorderly conduct, sort of a catch all charge.

After the prosecutor's office makes their determination, you will be scheduled for a status conference in the municipal court if your case was remanded. If the prosecutor's office decides to keep your case, it will either assign to the pre-indictment court, or in more serious cases, directly to a trial team for a grand jury presentment.

A Grand Jury is a panel of jurors who will vote on whether your case proceeds or not. If the Grand Jury returns (true bills) an indictment, you will next be scheduled for a pre-arraignment conference. If you have already hired a criminal defense attorney by this time, your attorney will probably try to have your appearance at this hearing waived.

The next appearance will be your arraignment, where you must plead guilty or not-guilty. The prosecutor's office will likely have provided all the evidence in the case to your attorney. The will ask acknowledgement of receipt of discovery. The arraignment is followed by status conferences and if necessary, trial. Call to speak with a Monmouth County criminal defense attorney to learn more about the process.

March 30, 2011

Monmouth County Assault Charge Lawyer

I represent clients on a regular basis who have been charged with assault in Monmouth County. While Simple Assault is a disorderly persons offense in New Jersey, Aggravated Assault carries felony consequences. Call now to speak with a Monmouth County Assault Lawyer.

Continue reading "Monmouth County Assault Charge Lawyer" »

December 21, 2010

Howell New Jersey Court Attorney Help and Directions

Howell Police make a large amount of criminal and DWI arrests. Shoplifting, Assault and Harassment charges are common in Howell Court. A lot of traffic tickets are also issued in the township, which borders Lakewood and Freehold Township.

Directions: From I-195: Use exit 31A for County Rd 547 S toward County Rd 524/Lakewood. Merge onto Lakewood Farmingdale Rd/Monmouth County Rd 547 S
Turn right at Old Tavern Rd.


View Larger Map

October 14, 2010

New Jersey Disorderly Persons Offense Lawyer Can Defend You

Criminal defendants in New Jersey are often confused about the particular charge they face after being arrested for a New Jersey disorderly persons offense. "Disorderly Persons" is not a specific type of crime. In fact, they are not crimes at all under NJ law. Rather, they are akin to misdemeanors.

Nevertheless, they are state criminal offenses and will subject you to a permanent criminal record if not expunged after conviction. Its obviously better to avoid the conviction at all rather than having to wait the necessary five years before becoming eligible for an expungement. The first step is therefore to retain a New Jersey disorderly persons lawyer as early as possible.

New Jersey classifies criminal offenses under three different general categories. Indictable offenses (in turn graded from 1st to 4th degree crimes) are commonly referred to as felonies in other states. The other two categories are disorderly persons and petty disorderly persons offenses.

Disorderly persons offenses in NJ include shoplifting, harassment, possession of less than 50 grams of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Disorderly persons offenses are punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a $1,000 fine. Any offense involving drug possession in NJ, including possession of less than 50 grams of marijuana, also carry a 6 month minimum driver's license suspension.

Disorderly persons offenses can be expunged after five years of conviction (or from when the individual pays off all fines and completes probation). The only diversionary program currently in place for disorderly persons offenses is the conditional discharge program. This is only available for possession of under 50 grams of marijuana. Anyone enrolling in the program must successfully complete 1 year probation, which may include random drug testing. After successful completion of the program, the charge is dismissed.

July 5, 2010

2 Arrests Made in Freehold Murder Case

Two former employees of a family murdered in their Freehold, NJ home were arrested last week in connection with the crime. The victims, a brother and sister who owned a local Chinese restaurant, were slain in an apparent robbery attempt in their South Street home in the borough.

The two suspects were apprehended within minutes of the first report of the crime. This occurred when a driver observed one of the victims laying in the street with his hands tied and bleeding.

A second female victim was located in a bedroom, who had been stabbed to death. Freehold police and the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office have charged Dong Biao Lin, 24 of New York along with Zeng Liang Chen, 20 also of New York with the crimes. The are accused of armed robbery, burglary, possession of a weapon, and felony murder.

The two were located on the outskirts of the borough and arrested by Freehold Township Police. This was after a second motorist saw the two and reported their whereabouts to police. The two are now lodged in the Monmouth County Jail in Freehold. Bail has been set at $3 Million.


June 29, 2010

New Jersey Assault Charge Lawyer - NJSA 2C:12-1

I frequently appear in courts across New Jersey to defend individuals against charges of assault. Unfortunately, this often involves domestic violence allegations as well. If you have been charged with assault in any New Jersey court, call now for a free consultation.

New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1


§ 2C:12-1. Assault


a. Simple assault. A person is guilty of assault if he:

(1) Attempts to cause or purposely, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; or(2) Negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or
(3) Attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury.

Simple assault is a disorderly persons offense unless committed in a fight or scuffle entered into by mutual consent, in which case it is a petty disorderly persons offense.

b. Aggravated assault. A person is guilty of aggravated assault if he:

(1) Attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely or knowingly or under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life recklessly causes such injury; or

(2) Attempts to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or

(3) Recklessly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or

(4) Knowingly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life points a firearm, as defined in section 2C:39-1 f., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or

(5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon:

(a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or

(b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of the duties of a fireman; or

(c) Any person engaged in emergency first-aid or medical services acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of emergency first-aid or medical services; or

(d) Any school board member, school administrator, teacher, school bus driver or other employee of a public or nonpublic school or school board while clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of his duties or because of his status as a member or employee of a public or nonpublic school or school board or any school bus driver employed by an operator under contract to a public or nonpublic school or school board while clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of his duties or because of his status as a school bus driver; or

(e) Any employee of the Division of Youth and Family Services while clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of his duties or because of his status as an employee of the division; or

(f) Any justice of the Supreme Court, judge of the Superior Court, judge of the Tax Court or municipal judge while clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of judicial duties or because of his status as a member of the judiciary; or

(g) Any operator of a motorbus or the operator's supervisor or any employee of a rail passenger service while clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of his duties or because of his status as an operator of a motorbus or as the operator's supervisor or as an employee of a rail passenger service; or

(h) Any Department of Corrections employee, county corrections officer, juvenile corrections officer, State juvenile facility employee, juvenile detention staff member, juvenile detention officer, probation officer or any sheriff, undersheriff, or sheriff's officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority; or

(i) Any employee, including any person employed under contract, of a utility company as defined in section 2 of P.L.1971, c.224 (C.2A:42-86) or a cable television company subject to the provisions of the "Cable Television Act," P.L.1972, c.186 (C.48:5A-1 et seq.) while clearly identifiable as being engaged in the performance of his duties in regard to connecting, disconnecting or repairing or attempting to connect, disconnect or repair any gas, electric or water utility, or cable television or telecommunication service; or

(6) Causes bodily injury to another person while fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer in violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this subsection upon proof of a violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10 which resulted in bodily injury to another person; or

(7) Attempts to cause significant bodily injury to another or causes significant bodily injury purposely or knowingly or, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life recklessly causes such significant bodily injury; or

(8) Causes bodily injury by knowingly or purposely starting a fire or causing an explosion in violation of N.J.S.2C:17-1 which results in bodily injury to any emergency services personnel involved in fire suppression activities, rendering emergency medical services resulting from the fire or explosion or rescue operations, or rendering any necessary assistance at the scene of the fire or explosion, including any bodily injury sustained while responding to the scene of a reported fire or explosion. For purposes of this subsection, "emergency services personnel" shall include, but not be limited to, any paid or volunteer fireman, any person engaged in emergency first-aid or medical services and any law enforcement officer. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this paragraph upon proof of a violation of N.J.S.2C:17-1 which resulted in bodily injury to any emergency services personnel; or

(9) Knowingly, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, points or displays a firearm, as defined in subsection f. of N.J.S.2C:39-1, at or in the direction of a law enforcement officer; or

(10) Knowingly points, displays or uses an imitation firearm, as defined in subsection f. of N.J.S.2C:39-1, at or in the direction of a law enforcement officer with the purpose to intimidate, threaten or attempt to put the officer in fear of bodily injury or for any unlawful purpose; or

(11) Uses or activates a laser sighting system or device, or a system or device which, in the manner used, would cause a reasonable person to believe that it is a laser sighting system or device, against a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority. As used in this paragraph, "laser sighting system or device" means any system or device that is integrated with or affixed to a firearm and emits a laser light beam that is used to assist in the sight alignment or aiming of the firearm.

Aggravated assault under subsections b.(1) and b.(6) is a crime of the second degree; under subsections b.(2), b.(7), b.(9) and b.(10) is a crime of the third degree; under subsections b.(3) and b.(4) is a crime of the fourth degree; and under subsection b.(5) is a crime of the third degree if the victim suffers bodily injury, otherwise it is a crime of the fourth degree. Aggravated assault under subsection b.(8) is a crime of the third degree if the victim suffers bodily injury; if the victim suffers significant bodily injury or serious bodily injury it is a crime of the second degree. Aggravated assault under subsection b.(11) is a crime of the third degree.

c. (1) A person is guilty of assault by auto or vessel when the person drives a vehicle or vessel recklessly and causes either serious bodily injury or bodily injury to another. Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the fourth degree if serious bodily injury results and is a disorderly persons offense if bodily injury results.

(2) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and serious bodily injury results and is a crime of the fourth degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and bodily injury results.

(3) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the second degree if serious bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) while:

(a) on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property;

(b) driving through a school crossing as defined in R.S.39:1-1 if the municipality, by ordinance or resolution, has designated the school crossing as such; or

(c) driving through a school crossing as defined in R.S.39:1-1 knowing that juveniles are present if the municipality has not designated the school crossing as such by ordinance or resolution.

Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel in violation of this paragraph.

A map or true copy of a map depicting the location and boundaries of the area on or within 1,000 feet of any property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board produced pursuant to section 1 of P.L.1987, c.101 (C.2C:35-7) may be used in a prosecution under subparagraph (a) of paragraph (3) of this section.

It shall be no defense to a prosecution for a violation of subparagraph (a) or (b) of paragraph (3) of this subsection that the defendant was unaware that the prohibited conduct took place while on or within 1,000 feet of any school property or while driving through a school crossing. Nor shall it be a defense to a prosecution under subparagraph (a) or (b) of paragraph (3) of this subsection that no juveniles were present on the school property or crossing zone at the time of the offense or that the school was not in session.

As used in this section, "vessel" means a means of conveyance for travel on water and propelled otherwise than by muscular power.

d. A person who is employed by a facility as defined in section 2 of P.L.1977, c.239 (C.52:27G-2) who commits a simple assault as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection a. of this section upon an institutionalized elderly person as defined in section 2 of P.L.1977, c.239 (C.52:27G-2) is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree.

e. (Deleted by amendment, P.L.2001, c.443).

f. A person who commits a simple assault as defined in paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of subsection a. of this section in the presence of a child under 16 years of age at a school or community sponsored youth sports event is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree. The defendant shall be strictly liable upon proof that the offense occurred, in fact, in the presence of a child under 16 years of age. It shall not be a defense that the defendant did not know that the child was present or reasonably believed that the child was 16 years of age or older. The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to create any liability on the part of a participant in a youth sports event or to abrogate any immunity or defense available to a participant in a youth sports event. As used in this act, "school or community sponsored youth sports event" means a competition, practice or instructional event involving one or more interscholastic sports teams or youth sports teams organized pursuant to a nonprofit or similar charter or which are member teams in a youth league organized by or affiliated with a county or municipal recreation department and shall not include collegiate, semi-professional or professional sporting events.


History:


L. 1978, c. 95; amended 1979, c. 178, § 22; 1981, c. 290, § 14; 1983, c. 101, § 1; 1985, c. 97, § 2; 1985, c. 444, § 1; 1990, c. 87, § 1; 1991, c. 237, § 2; 1991, c. 341, § 2; 1993, c. 219, § 2; 1995, c. 6, § 1; 1995, c. 181, § 1; 1995, c. 211, § 1; 1995, c. 307, § 2; 1997, c. 42, § 1; 1997, c. 119, § 1; 1999, c. 77, § 1, eff. April 30, 1999; 1999, c. 185, § 2, eff. Dec. 1, 1999; 1999, c. 281, § 1, eff. Feb. 1, 2000; 1999, c. 381, § 1, eff. Jan. 14, 2000; 2001, c. 215, § 1, eff. Aug. 20, 2001; 2001, c. 443, § 2, eff. Jan. 11, 2002; 2002, c. 53, § 1, eff. Aug. 3, 2002; 2003, c. 218, § 1, eff. Jan. 9, 2004; 2005, c. 2, § 1, eff. Jan. 19, 2005; 2006, c. 78, § 2, eff. Aug. 2, 2006.

Amendment Note:

2006 amendment, by Chapter 78, in b.(5)(d), inserted "public or nonpublic school or" three times preceding "school board"; and substituted "(i)" for "I" as the designation for the subparagraph following b.(5)(h).

Effective Dates:

Section 6 of L. 1999, c. 185 provides: "This act shall take effect on the first day of the fourth month after enactment." Chapter 185, L. 1999, was approved on August 19, 1999.

Section 2 of L. 1999, c. 281 provides: "This act shall take effect on the first day of the second month following enactment." Chapter 281, L. 1999, was approved on December 20, 1999.

Continue reading "New Jersey Assault Charge Lawyer - NJSA 2C:12-1" »

May 20, 2010

Under NJ Law, Conspiracy to Terroristic Threats Not a Lesser Included of Second-Degree Aggravated Assault

State v. Frederick J. Massimi, Jr., unpublished opinion, App. Div. Docket No. A-4424-07T4 (April 30, 2010) - Conviction Reversed. "[Defendant] was found guilty of conspiracy to commit terroristic threats as a lesser-included offense to conspiracy to commit aggravated assault in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2 and 2C:12-3....

Defendant now argues that 'conspiracy to commit a terroristic threat is not a lesser included offense of second degree aggravated assault [and] therefore, the trial court erred by finding Mr. Massimi guilty of the lesser included offense"....

As the decision to consider conspiracy to commit a terroristic threat was not considered at a charge conference, and defendant did not request or consent its consideration, it must be a true lesser-included offense in order to sustain the conviction....

[W]e agree with defendant that '[c]onspiracy to commit a terroristic threat is not a lesser included offense of conspiracy to commit aggravated assault because of the added element of the threat to commit a violent crime with the intent to terrorize.' The relevant portion of N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3a requires such a threat to 'commit [a] crime of violence with the purpose to terrorize another ...."

Certainly, a second degree aggravated assault is a crime of violence. It is found within Part 1, Subtitle 2 of the Code of Criminal Justice containing 'offenses involving danger to the person.' See also N.J.S.A. 2C:43-7.2d (the history of which reflects, by virtue of its pre-June 2001 provisions, application to second degree aggravated assaults). But while an aggravated assault may terrorize a victim, it need not do so and need not be performed with that purpose. Thus, while N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3 follows the provisions of Chapter 12 of the Code of Criminal Justice dealing with aggravated assaults, it is not a lesser-included offense within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2C:1-8d."

February 8, 2010

Freehold Borough Municipal Court

Freehold Borough Municipal Court

Location: 38 Jackson Street
Freehold, NJ 07728

Phone: (732) 462-2444
Fax: (732) 294-1520

The judge is the Honorable Scott J. Basen, J.M.C. The prosecutor is Kathy Sheedy, Esq. The Court Administrator is Stacy A. Kitson. The public defender is Richard Lomurro, Esq. Freehold Borough sees a lot of minor criminal matters including assaults, as well as a fair share of DWIs and speeding tickets.

Freehold Borough is a small town located in Monmouth County, New Jersey. It is surrounded by the Township of Freehold. The 2000 Census reported the borough's population at 10,976. Freehold is the county seat of Monmouth County. Freehold Borough first became a legally recognized town on March 25, 1869.

Freehold Borough spans about 2.0 square miles and is located in the center of Monmouth County and is about 65 miles south of New York City and 40 miles northeast of Philadelphia, PA. The town is approximately 16 miles west of Asbury Park and and the Atlantic Ocean.

The 2000 census reported that there were 10,976 people, 3,695 households, and 2,571 families residing in Freehold. The population density was reported at 5,501.1 people per square mile (2,118.9/km2). 3,821 housing units existed in Freehold at an average density of 1,915.1/sq mi (737.6/km2). The ethnic composition of Freehold is about 71.02% White, 15.83% Black, .55% Native American, 2.45% Asian, .02% Pacific Islander, 6.64% from other races, and 3.49% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 28.07% of the population. There exists a significant and thriving Latino community in Freehold, centered mostly in the downtown area.

There are approximately 3,695 homes in Freehold, of which 32.8% had underage children. 49% of the families were married couples living together, 14.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 30.4% were non-families. 24.3% of all households were made up of individuals and 10.6% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.96 and the average family size was 3.39.

In the borough the population was spread out with 24.8% under the age of 18, 10.9% from 18 to 24, 34.4% from 25 to 44, 19.3% from 45 to 64, and 10.7% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 33 years. For every 100 females there were 106.3 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 102.7 males.
The median income for a household in the borough was $48,654, and the median income for a family was $53,374. Males had a median income of $35,855 versus $30,377 for females. The per capita income for the borough is about $19,910. About 7.7% of families and 12% of the population live below the poverty line.

Freehold operates as a town under the Borough form of New Jersey municipal government. The Borough is governed by a mayor and a six-member borough council. The mayor of Freehold is directly elected to a four-year term of office. Borough council members serve three-year terms on a staggered basis, with two seats coming up for election each year. The governing body conducts all of its business during twice-monthly public meetings and is empowered to adopt local ordinances and pass resolutions.
The Mayor of Freehold Borough is Michael Wilson (elected in 1985, and the longest-serving mayor in Freehold Borough history). Members of the Freehold Borough Council are Council President Jaye Sims, Michael J. DiBenedetto, Kevin A. Kane, George Schnurr, Sharon Shutzer and John Newman.

Freehold Borough is located in New Jersey's 4th Congressional District and is part of New Jersey's 12th Legislative District.

Freehold is represented in the United States House of Representatives by Republican Christopher Smith. New Jersey is represented in the United States Senate by Frank Lautenberg (D, Cliffside Park) and Bob Menendez (D, Hoboken).
At the state level, the 12th legislative district of the New Jersey Legislature, is represented in the New Jersey Senate by Jennifer Beck and in the New Jersey General Assembly by Caroline Casagrande (R, Colts Neck Township) and Declan O'Scanlon (R, Little Silver). The Governor of New Jersey is Chris Christie (R, Mendham) and the Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey is Kim Guadagno (R, Monmouth Beach).

Monmouth County is governed by a five-member Board of Chosen Freeholders. As of 2010, Monmouth County's Freeholders are Freeholder Director Lillian G. Burry (R, Colts Neck), Freeholder Deputy Director Robert D. Clifton (R, Matawan), John D'Amico, Jr. (D, Oceanport), Amy A. Mallet (D, Fair Haven) and John P. Curley (R, Middletown).[17]

Freehold Borough is home to about 1,400 students in public school for grades pre-K through 8. Schools located in Freehold include Freehold Learning Center Pre-K through grade 5 (515 students), Park Avenue Elementary School K - 5 (423 students) and Freehold Borough Intermediate School grades 6 - 8 (381 students).

Students in public school for grades 9-12 attend Freehold Borough High School, as part of the Freehold Regional High School District. The Freehold Regional High School District (FRHSD) also educates students residing in Colts Neck Township, Englishtown, Farmingdale, Freehold Township, Howell Township, Manalapan Township and Marlboro. FRHSD also has a set of specialized learning programs, each one focusing on a certain topic (business, engineering, cooking, etc.) and is for students who are talented in that topic and wish to study it in college.

The Borough was given a research grant in 2004 by the National Institute of Justice, a research arm of the United States Department of Justice. The grant was named the "Teacher-Parent Authentication Security System II: The Next Generation of Iris Recognition Technology in Schools" and was awarded to the Freehold Borough Board of Education in the amount of $369,998.

Freehold was initially known as Monmouth Courthouse. In 1714, John Reid, the first Surveyor General of East Jersey, wanted the county seat located in Freehold Township. Reid then sole the land now comprising the Borough to the Board of Chosen Freeholders at a bargain price. This is probably how Freehold won the seat over Middletown and Shrewsbury. In exchange for the subsidized price, Reid put a covenant in the deed that would revert ownership back to his family if the land ever ceased being used as a courthouse.

Freehold is well services by highways and roads. U.S. Route 9, Route 33, 537, and 522 traverse the Freehold Borough. The Henry Hudson Trail also runs north along an abandoned rail line to Matawan.

The New Jersey Transit bus service links Freehold with surrounding towns, Newark Liberty Airport and Manhattan. Service also exists from Freehold and Six Flags Great Adventure.

December 23, 2009

NJ Town Court Locations (Mercer County)

Mercer County Superior Court
Mailing Address:
PO Box 8068
Trenton, NJ 08608
Street Address:
209 S Broad Street
Trenton, NJ 08608

East Windsor Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
80 One Mile Road, East
Windsor, NJ 08520
Phone Number: (609) 448-3228

Ewing Township Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
2 Jake Garzio Drive
Ewing, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 883-2900

Hamilton Township
Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
1270 Whitehorse Ave Cn00150
Hamilton, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 581-4071

Hightstown Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
148 N Main Street
Hightstown, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 490-5105

Hopewell Borough Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
PO Box 343
Hopewell, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 466-0968

Hopewell Township Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
201 Washington Crossing
Pennington Road Titusville, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 737-1035

Lawrence Township Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
Municipal Square P.O. Box 6006 Lawrenceville, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 844-7159

Pennington Borough Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
30 North Main Street
Pennington, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 737-1016

Princeton Borough Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
PO Box 390 1 Monument Dr
Princeton, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 497-7600

Princeton Township Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
400 Witherspoon St.
Princeton Township, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 924-5042

Trenton Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
225 N Clinton Ave
PO Box 1360 Trenton, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 989-3700

Washington Township Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
1117 Route 130
Robbinsville, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 259-7085

West Windsor Municipal Court
Mailing Address:
20 Municipal Drive PO Box 38 Princeton Junction, NJ
Phone Number: (609) 799-0915

December 20, 2009

NJ Illegal Search and Seizure by Police (Appellate Update)

In this case recently decided on appeal, a NJ criminal defense appeal lawyer successfully argued that the police's search and seizure of evidence was illegal. The court found that the State could not establish that the police were acting under the community caretaking or plain view exceptions.

State v. Andre Scott, unpublished opinion, App. Div. Docket No. A-1787-07T4 (November 17, 2009) - Conviction reversed, suppression ordered. "The State justifies the warrantless entry of the police officers into the first-floor apartment as a part of their community caretaking function.

However, ... , the motion judge found that the police's community caretaking function arose only after they observed the open door to the first floor apartment -- an observation necessarily made from the building's hallway, since the judge found that the building's owner, Martin, was unable to see the doorway from her vantage point at the entrance to the residence.

Nothing in the record suggests that the police had any authorization to enter the hallway, either from Martin or from a first-floor resident. Their presence in that hallway thus violated the Fourth Amendment....

[T]he State has failed to meet its burden of proving that it was reasonably fulfilling its community caretaking function when it entered, first, the building owned by Martin, second, the first-floor apartment in that building and, third, the bedroom occupied by defendant and Taylor.

We further conclude that because the police were not lawfully on the premises, their invocation of the plain view exception to the warrant requirement as justification for seizure of the drugs found on the bedroom nightstand fails." (Michael Noriega, Designated Counsel)

http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a1787-07.pdf

December 18, 2009

Voluntary Intoxication as Defense (NJ Appeal Attorney Update)

In this recent case decided on appeal, the defendant claimed his attorney was ineffective at his criminal trial because the attorney did not raise the issue of voluntary intoxication as a defense to defendant's shooting and weapons charges. Summary by Mark Friedman.

State v. Victor McCargo, unpublished opinion, App. Div. Docket No. A-5691-06T4 (November 16, 2009) - Denial of PCR reversed, remanded for evidentiary hearing. "One of the issues defendant raised in his petition was his allegation that his trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to raise his intoxicated state at the time of the shooting as a defense.

He included with his petition certifications from his brother Dante McCargo and his friend Arnold Lyles, as well as his own certification, detailing the amount of alcohol he had consumed.... In [his] certification, [defense counsel] stated that he left it to his co-counsel to discuss the question of intoxication with defendant since co-counsel was to conduct defendant's direct examination....

If an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel is to fail because of a strategic choice made by counsel, there should be a showing that, indeed, counsel considered the issue and selected one avenue of defense over another. There would be many sound reasons for trial counsel to have elected not to pursue an intoxication defense in this matter, but we are unable to conclude from this record that such an election was in fact made....

Because there is no record on this question, we are unable to conclude whether it is entirely devoid of merit or whether defendant is entitled to further relief. We thus reverse the order denying post-conviction relief and remand the matter for further proceedings." (Patricia Drozd, Designated Counsel)
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a5691-06.pdf

November 6, 2009

Nearly 100 Arrested in Monmouth County Fugitive Sting

In a joint-operation conducted by the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office, the Monmouth County Sheriff's Office, the US Marshal's Service, the New Jersey Parole Board, and the Asbury Park and Neptune Police Departments, nearly 100 fugitives were arrested over the course of three days last weekend.

Many of the defendants arrested in Monmouth County are suspected of felony charges.
These include gang-related crimes, aggravated assaults, burglaries, and drug charges. Most of the arrests were made in the cities of Neptune and Asbury Park.

Police also seized various firearms as well as drugs including large amounts of heroin and marijuana. Most of the suspects are lodged at the Monmouth County Jail, Freehold Township.

November 3, 2009

Freehold Man Charged with Stabbing in Long Branch, Monmouth County

Sean Robinson, 41 of Freehold, has been charged by police in Monmouth County with allegedly stabbing his child's mother in Long Branch. The woman was critically injured in the attack.

Last Friday, Long Branch police responded to a 911 call reporting that a woman had been attacked by a man wielding a knife. Police and paramedics arrived at the University Place home in Long Branch and found the woman with several knife wounds. Police later arrested the suspect on Joline Avenue and charged him with aggravated assault, attempted murder, and related weapons offenses.

Robinson is also in the hospital as a result of wounds he sustained in the attack. After his recovery, he will likely be lodged at the Monmouth County Jail in Freehold Township in lieu of $630,000 bail.

November 1, 2009

Freehold Man Charged with Decade-Old Ocean County Sex Offense

Thomas Anderson, a 42 year-old man from Freehold, was charged this week with endangering the welfare of a child and sexual assault. The crimes allegedly took place approximately 14 years ago in Ocean County. Anderson is lodged in the Ocean County Jail. His bail is set at $250,000. It is not clear if he has retained a criminal defense attorney.